Former President Jacob Zuma's legal team is back in court, seeking a reinterpretation of orders compelling him to repay approximately R28 million to the state for his private legal fees. Advocate Thabani Masuku argued before the High Court in Pretoria that the court should reconsider the 'fairness' of the repayment order.
The funds in question were initially approved by the Presidency and the State Attorney to cover Zuma's legal expenses over a period of 20 years. However, following a review initiated by the Democratic Alliance (DA) and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), the High Court in December 2018 and the Supreme Court in April 2021 ruled that Zuma was liable for the repayment.
Masuku contends that the state, not Zuma, is responsible for the unlawful conduct, alleging violations of the Public Finance Management Act. He argued that Zuma was placed in this position by the State Attorney and the Presidency.
"When this court is now confronted with the question which the Supreme Court of Appeals says may well be a just and equitable remedy, it should not close the door to the defenses raised against Mr. Zuma," Masuku stated. He further argued that Zuma faces potential financial ruin, including the loss of his pension and home, if forced to repay the full amount.
The legal battle continues as Zuma seeks to avoid personal liability for the legal fees, placing the blame squarely on the state's actions.
Other Trending News
- Prasa opens doors to new student accommodation in Braamfontein
- Umalusi withdraws from quality assurance of NCV exams
- Ramaphosa suspends Inspector-General of Intelligence Imtiaz Fazel
- Rescue teams scour Nottingham Road area for missing light aircraft
- Ngizwe Mchunu given ultimatum over anti-LGBTIQ+ wedding remarks
- UPDATE : One KZN light aircraft found, search continues for second