Judge President Mbenenge: Sexual Harassment Claims Spark Heated Debate!

Judge President Mbenenge: Sexual Harassment Claims Spark Heated Debate! - Imagen ilustrativa del artículo Judge President Mbenenge: Sexual Harassment Claims Spark Heated Debate!

The Judicial Conduct Tribunal's investigation into allegations of sexual harassment against Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge continues to stir controversy in South Africa. The tribunal is examining WhatsApp exchanges between Mbenenge and his secretary, Andiswa Mengo, which include requests for nude pictures and questions about Mengo's sexual preferences.

Expert Witness Stands Firm

Gender-based violence expert Dr. Lisa Vetten testified that Mbenenge's WhatsApp messages amounted to sexual harassment. She stood by her assessment during cross-examination by advocate Muzi Sikhakhane, who represents Mbenenge.

Accusations of Bias and Cultural Insensitivity

Sikhakhane accused Vetten of bias towards the complainant and questioned her understanding of Xhosa culture and language. He argued that her analysis was flawed because she didn't have access to Mbenenge's perspective when reviewing the WhatsApp messages and only scanned Mengo's transcript.

Mbenenge's Defense to Present Witnesses

Sikhakhane stated that he would call three witnesses before Mbenenge testifies. The Tribunal has ruled that Mengo's legal team will not be able to directly cross-examine Mbenenge and his witnesses, a decision that has drawn criticism from some legal observers.

The Core of the Allegations

Vetten emphasized that Mbenenge was persistent in his requests for pictures of Mengo, including nude images, and in inquiring about her sexual preferences. The tribunal's findings could have significant implications for Mbenenge's career and the integrity of the judiciary in South Africa. The case highlights the importance of addressing power dynamics and ensuring a safe and respectful work environment within the legal profession.

  • WhatsApp messages at the heart of the allegations.
  • Expert witness defends sexual harassment finding.
  • Defense argues bias and cultural misunderstanding.

Compartir artículo